So I have to admit that I love going to see Comic Book movies. I enjoyed the first two Spider-Man movies and can't wait for the reboot (mostly because of Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone). I am a huge fan of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, and I am really looking forward to The Dark Knight Rises. I am totally in love with Marvel right now for their lead up the the Avengers movies. I love movie series, so I totally dig what they are doing with Iron Man, Hulk, Thor, and Captain America as a lead up the the Avengers.
So far this summer I have seen all three of the comic book inspired movies that have come out and I wanted to talk a little bit about two of them here. I got a text message from my friend Shawn Thursday while I was at work, asking me if I wanted to go to see Green Lantern at midnight with him. I have been a little hesitant about this movie but I saw it anyway. I probably should have stayed home.
I don't know if it is me or what but I don't find it interesting when the hero can do anything that he can imagine. This is my problem with Superman as well (he's just too perfect and good at everything). When a big green fist is what he imagines to punch out the bad guy I think its a little lame. Inception did this type of thing better I think, they could dream up bigger guns while still keeping the tension and the realism even though it took place in a dream. In the Green Lantern everything that he imagined was green and silly looking to me.
The look of the movie just didn't do it for me. They over both over did it and under did it with the CGI at the same time. There was too much of it, and it didn't look compelling to me. I know a lot of this movie takes place in outer space and it isn't a real place they were at but it also didn't look like it could have been real. I think they used too much green and purple.
The story left much to be desired. I think this is a time when having a long running comic series worked against the movie. Or maybe the writers didn't know where to pull from. The beginning of the movie left me asking questions like, "how did that guy get trapped on that planet?", and "who are these guys that accidentally let him out?". There was a vague answer to the first question later in the movie but nothing really concrete. Is this a problem just for people like me who have not read the comic books? Also, they kind of hint at a past relationship between Hal Jordan and Carol Ferris which is supposed to create tension between the two characters but they never really explain anything about that relationship. I guess that would just fall under the problem of a lack of character development in general.
Compare this to X-Men First Class, which for the whole time I was watching it I didn't think about the effects. Obviously there are effects, because I don't think that Jennifer Lawrence is actually blue, and can change back a forth. I just don't notice the effects that much. Also, the characters development is what makes that movie so compelling and interesting to watch. Along with the performances buy the entire cast (short of January Jones... ). Kevin Bacon was an interesting bad guy with intent and menus. While I love Peter Sarsgaard in most things that he does I didn't think that being possessed by black smoke was that interesting (gross, but not interesting). There are just so many good things that I can say about X-Men that the Green Lantern lacked, but I probably shouldn't write a longer essay about the Green Lantern than I did any paper I wrong when I was in college :) .
I hope to see The Art of of Getting By on my next day off, so I hope to be able to write about that one soon!
Until then....
No comments:
Post a Comment